Tuesday, November 9, 2004

washingtonpost.com: Fight Over Icon Has Plenty of Precedent

washingtonpost.com: Fight Over Icon Has Plenty of Precedent

Fight Over Icon Has Plenty of Precedent
Deputies to Arafat Have Long Seen His Wife as Threat
By Molly Moore
Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, November 9, 2004; Page A18


JERUSALEM, Nov. 8 -- They seemed mismatched from the start: The young bride, Suha Tawil, wore flashy designer clothes. The bridegroom, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, was scruffy and grizzled in rumpled combat fatigues. She was a Greek Orthodox Christian, he a Sunni Muslim. He was a legend, the very symbol of the Palestinian people. She was one of his secretaries -- and less than half his age.

She dyed her hair blond in a society of black-haired people, wore form-fitting dresses and pantsuits in a culture where most women drape themselves in scarves and shapeless robes, and drove her own car. All that was more than enough to make Suha Arafat suspect in the eyes of Palestinians grand and ordinary.

"It is already not easy to be a woman in the Arab world," she told the French entertainment magazine Gala in 1994. "But when you become the wife of Yasser Arafat -- a man who for so long remained single -- you are rejected."

In a power structure in which influence was measured largely by proximity to the leader, nothing was more threatening to members of the longtime bachelor's inner circle than a wife, especially a smart, Sorbonne-educated, trilingual one who loathed them and said so.

In a 1998 interview with the Spanish newspaper El Pais, she accused the men around Arafat of tarnishing his image with their "corruption, lack of integrity, a domineering attitude and the adopting of undemocratic methods." She has admonished his closest associates for building mansions while average Palestinians lived in poverty.

These days it is Suha Arafat who is accused of extravagance.

During the nearly three years that Arafat was captive inside his compound in the West Bank city of Ramallah, his wife and 9-year-old daughter reportedly lived in a multimillion-dollar Paris apartment.

British newspapers have delighted in reports of Suha Arafat's prime seats at Paris fashion shows and shopping sprees with friends such as the wife of Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi and the king of Morocco's sister.

French banking officials last year opened an investigation into allegations that $11.4 million was funneled from Palestinian bank accounts in Switzerland to two French bank accounts in Suha Arafat's name in 2002 and 2003. A Justice Ministry spokesman would not comment Monday on the inquiry's status.

When the accusations surfaced last year, Suha Arafat posed a question to Al Hayat, a London-based Arabic-language newspaper: What was strange about Arafat "sending money to his wife overseas, especially when I handle Palestinian matters and interests?"

Suha Tawil was introduced to Yasser Arafat by her mother, Ramonda Tawil, a prominent Palestinian activist and writer. Suha Tawil helped arrange one of his trips to Paris while she was studying politics at the Sorbonne. A few months later Arafat offered her a job on his personal staff in Tunis, where he was living at the time. They married on July 17, 1990.

She has described her first years of marriage as lonely and difficult. She has told Vogue magazine that her husband once compared her to the former Philippine first lady, Imelda Marcos, after seeing her vast shoe collection.

When the couple arrived in the Gaza Strip in 1994 after the Oslo peace accords allowed the Palestinian leader's return, Arafat was content to share their home with aides and Kalashnikov-toting bodyguards, until his wife persuaded him to add a more private second floor. But after she decorated the three-bedroom flat, Arafat said it reminded him of a cabaret and returned to his spare quarters on the first floor, she told the New York Times in 1999. She remained upstairs.

"Luxury is in your father's banker's home, not mine," he cautioned his wife in a reference to her father's banking career, she told the London Observer.

Suha Arafat converted to Islam and tried to win over the Palestinian people by working in behalf of women and children. But as the birth of her daughter drew near in 1995, she undercut her efforts by announcing she would have the baby in Paris because, she said, hospital conditions in Gaza were unsanitary.

Correspondent Glenn Frankel in Paris contributed to this report.

FN Radio

I had a particularly productive night last.  I finished doing the initial setup for FNRadio/Skynet Radio, my company's radio station.  Essentially, the desire for the station came from the need to share our tunes across the network.  It seems that I've become the offical company DJ, since in our close quarters at the old office everyone grew accustomed to listening to my tunes blaring from my computer, and now that everyone's all spread out and such, it makes it difficult to hear anything except from one's own machine.  The problem is if everyone plays different music, it sounds cacaughonous in the office.

So essentially, I got everyone playing from the same song-sheet.

As it turns out, I've done something good here with the station.  It's been up for a day, and I've already over 47 listeners -- wacky, eh?  AKA radio could never manage more than 14.

If you want to listen/request music, go to http://aacs.kicks-ass.net/fnradio/playing.html - the site's not exactly done, but it is functional.

/rizzn

Music on the Turntables Currently: leftfield - open up (FN Radio: Smooth Sounds of SkyNet)

Monday, November 8, 2004

Bush is a Sumbitch

This is an excerpt from last weeks Mark and Darrell Show ... Andrew Veal called in about his attempted suicide in protest of Bush's win in the election.

/rizzn

Sunday, November 7, 2004

Modern Political Liberalism - the new bigotry

[Rizzn's Note: It's getting bad in here.  By in here, I am referring to our country of America.  By getting bad, I refer to what I have taken to calling liberal bigotry.

I'm not going to go into a great definition of liberal bigotry.  Instead I'm going to tell you a story that sparked me on this journey, and then I'm going to simply post some quotes up here from common liberal newspapers and sources, as well as some random blogs.

A few weeks ago, I watched the VEEP debates.  I commented on them, and my comments were favorable to Dick Cheney.  I posted these comments up on the RantRadio forum.  Then along came an idiot named gManiaxe.  He decided he was going to goad me into an argument/flame-war by calling my ideas and judgement laughable ("it is hilarious that you think that ...").

I really thought about how indicative this is of the liberal bigotry going on in America today -- a whole presidential campaign was just waged on that idea.

I'm not going to wax philisophical about it just this minute; instead i'll let these other, more accomplished writers, do my talking for me.]

U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown verbally attacked a top Bush administration official during a briefing on the Haiti crisis Wednesday, calling the President's policy on the beleaguered nation "racist" and his representatives "a bunch of white men."

Brown sat directly across the table from Noriega and yelled into a microphone. Her comments sent a hush over the hourlong meeting, which was attended by about 30 people, including several members of Congress and Bush administration officials.

Noriega later told Brown: "As a Mexican-American, I deeply resent being called a racist and branded a white man," according to three participants.

Brown then told him "you all look alike to me," the participants said.

February 25, Miami Sun-Sentinel



Here in Massachusetts, especially in places like Cambridge, it’s all too common to hear people talk about conservative minorities in terms that are patently racist.  What’s galling of course, is the reflexive attitude that all conservatives are racists who want to turn the clock back to segregation and slavery.  If their own behavior gets pointed out to them, they talk about Trent Lott, conveniently forgetting both their own klansman Bobby Byrd and the fact that the GOP forced Lott to resign as Senate majority leader.  You see, it isn’t our plantation (never was) - it’s their plantation.  And the likes of Ted Rall and Ted Kennedy get mighty upset when the fieldhands get uppity. 

July 8, MartiniPundit



It's encouraging that the right is less hostile to gays and lesbians than it used to be. President Bush argued in his 1994 run for governor that gay sex should be illegal, while now he feels comfortable hitting up gays for campaign contributions.

On the other hand, the left seems more contemptuous than ever of evangelicals. Sensitive liberals who avoid expressions like "ghetto blaster," because that might be racially offensive, blithely dismiss conservative Christians as "Jesus freaks" or "fanatics."

Take Ted Turner. He has called Christianity a "religion for losers" and once ridiculed CNN employees observing Ash Wednesday as "Jesus freaks." Later, he apologized.

Granted, the Bible denounces male homosexuality, although it strikes me as inconsistent not to execute people who work on the Sabbath (Exodus 35:2) and not to crack down on those who get haircuts (Leviticus 19:27) or wear clothes with more than one kind of thread (Leviticus 19:19).

But there's no clear objection in the Bible to lesbianism at all. And since some fundamentalists have argued that AIDS is God's punishment for gay men, it's worth noting that lesbians are at less risk of AIDS than straight women. So if God is smiting gay men for their sin, is he rewarding lesbians for their holiness?

Those kinds of pointed questions are fair, but sneering is not. And in polite society, conservative Christians — especially Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses — are among the last groups it's still acceptable to mock.

This resentment is global. In a Tyndale Lecture in England last year, Cristina Odone complained: "The chattering classes . . . pride themselves on being tolerant. . . . Yet they share one prejudice that turns them into rabid persecutors: Christians."

Liberals often protest that they would have nothing against conservative Christians if they were not led by hypocritical blowhards who try to impose their Ten Commandments plaques, sexual mores and creationism on society. But that's a crude stereotype, and it ignores the Christian right's accomplishments. Polls show that evangelical Christians are more likely to contribute to charities that help the needy, and in horror spots in Africa Catholics and other Christians are the bulwark of the health care system.

Moreover, saying that one will tolerate evangelicals who do not evangelize — well, that's like Christians saying they have nothing against gays who remain celibate.

April 24, New York Times



I'm just fed up with the rampant hypocrisy coming from a good portion of the left, particularly those who feel the need to take the most extreme elements of conservatism and use them to tar the entire conservative community while simulaneously denying that the extreme leftists are a part of the left. It's hypocrisy, pure and simple. Yes, there are whack jobs on the right, but they do not represent the views of the majority of conservatives; that's why they are called extremists. Get it?

Probably not.

June 17 2003, Shots Across the Bow



What are the truths of liberalism? Good Hate is Love.  The Liberal cause is Good, Perfect, and Correct, incapable of error or guilt.  Liberal Intolerance of Intolerance is not Intolerance;  Liberal Hatred of Hatred is not Hatred. Liberal Bigotry against Bigotry is not Bigotry.  Good Hate is the Righteous Anger of the Democrat.

Trilobyte Magazine: The Liberal Catechism
http://www.trilobyte-mag.com/catechism.htm

Thursday, November 4, 2004

Episode III: Revenge of the Sith

The trailer for EPIII is out.  I'd put it on my server for download (if I were feeling suicidal about the damn box), so instead I post the BitTorrent Link: http://www.numbski.net/downloads/sw3trailer.torrent

If you don't have bittorrent, then you'll just hafta wait until the starwars.com servers come back to life after being slashdotted.

I watched the trailer just now, and I must say, I think the prequel franchise might just have redeemed itself.  Remember that warm fuzzy feeling of hope you got when you saw Matrix Reloaded/Revolutions trailers for the first time?

Prepare yourself.

/rizzn

Wednesday, November 3, 2004

It's called a GOOD START!

Last night, or early this morning (depending on your perspective) right around 3:25AM, it was announced that there were 3500 Kerry supporting lawyers waiting to help him challenge the election results in Ohio.  These are just the lawyers in Cincinatti and the Ohio area -- this doesn't count the additional lawyers being shuttled in around the country (like the ones Kerry intends to bring in on the Red Sox airplane).

Where other people see a post-election quagmire, I see opportunity.  Keep in mind that these are not just lawyers, but Kerry supporters, too. Remember that joke: "What do you call 100,000 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean? A good start."

I think my point is clear.

/rizzn

Tuesday, November 2, 2004

Something Smells Rotten in Kerryland (bin Ladin text included)

Below my comments here is the full transcript of the bin Ladin speech, transcribed yesterday by AlJazeera news. I want to pull out some selected statements that I think are particularly interesting.

Take this quote: 'Even though we are in the fourth year after the events of September 11th, Bush is still engaged in distortion, deception and hiding from you the real causes. And thus, the reasons are still there for a repeat of what occurred.
http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/releases/pr_2004_0311c.html

Compare it to this John Kerry quote: "The Bush Cheney Campaign uses Weapons of Deception and Distortion because they can't have an honest debate about jobs and taxes"

Bin Ladin again: "This is due to many factors, chief amongst them, that we have found it difficult to deal with the Bush administration in light of the resemblance it bears to the regimes in our countries, half of which are ruled by the military and the other half which are ruled by the sons of kings and presidents."

Compare it to this quote from John Kerry's website: "I too believe that the Bush Regime has lied to America, bullied the world and destroyed the economy. We must have change and it must come now."
http://www.johnkerry.com/communities/republicans/testimonials.html

Even more chilling:"It is true that this shows that al-Qaida has gained, but on the other hand, it shows that the Bush administration has also gained, something of which anyone who looks at the size of the contracts acquired by the shady Bush administration-linked mega-corporations, like Haliburton and its kind, will be convinced. And it all shows that the real loser is...you. "

Kerry said, likewise: "George Bush and Dick Cheney don't fight to keep your jobs here because they want to help their friends at the top. They are not on your side. Their tax cuts have not helped the middle class. Instead, they've helped people like their friends at Halliburton. "
http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/speeches/spc_2004_1002.html

He also said this: "He should use more Iraqi contractors and workers, instead of big corporations like Halliburton."
http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/speeches/spc_2004_0920.html

Taking a page from Michael Moore and Bill Maher, bin Ladin says: "It is the American people and their economy. And for the record, we had agreed with the Commander-General Muhammad Ataa, Allah have mercy on him, that all the operations should be carried out within twenty minutes, before Bush and his administration notice. "

But peep this quote by Kerry: "Earlier, addressing minority journalists in the nation's capital, Kerry was asked what he would have done as president the moment he received word of the World Trade Center attacks. Bush spent seven minutes at a Florida elementary school after his chief of staff, Andrew Card, whispered, ''America is under attack,'' as TV cameras recorded the anxious scene."
http://www.suntimes.com/output/elect/cst-nws-elec06.html

Now, as I've said before, from personal experience, the President's compadres are mostly scumbags. I have no direct dealings with the President in my past, but I have dealt with his secretary of the Navy, and several other family friends before, and they've always tried to screw me and my associates over, legally or illegally if necessary. This is why I won't vote for him.

But the stinking smell I've been catching whiff of from the Kerry camp ensures that I won't vote for him either. Today I identified where I had smelled his skunky scent before -- Osama bin Ladin.

Here's the original unedited transcript of bin Ladin's speech:

Praise be to Allah who created the creation for his worship and commanded them to be just and permitted the wronged one to retaliate against the oppressor in kind. To proceed:

Peace be upon he who follows the guidance: People of America this talk of mine is for you and concerns the ideal way to prevent another Manhattan, and deals with the war and its causes and results.

Before I begin, I say to you that security is an indispensable pillar of human life and that free men do not forfeit their security, contrary to Bush's claim that we hate freedom. If so, then let him explain to us why we don't strike for example ' Sweden? And we know that freedom-haters don't possess defiant spirits like those of the 19 ' may Allah have mercy on them.

No, we fight because we are free men who don't sleep under oppression. We want to restore freedom to our nation, just as you lay waste to our nation. So shall we lay waste to yours.

No-one except a dumb thief plays with the security of others and then makes himself believe he will be secure. Whereas thinking people, when disaster strikes, make it their priority to look for its causes, in order to prevent it happening again.

But I am amazed at you. Even though we are in the fourth year after the events of September 11th, Bush is still engaged in distortion, deception and hiding from you the real causes. And thus, the reasons are still there for a repeat of what occurred.

So I shall talk to you about the story behind those events and shall tell you truthfully about the moments in which the decision was taken, for you to consider.

I say to you, Allah knows that it had never occurred to us to strike the towers. But after it became unbearable and we witnessed the oppression and tyranny of the American/Israeli coalition against our people in Palestine and Lebanon, it came to my mind.

The events that affected my soul in a direct way started in 1982 when America permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American Sixth Fleet helped them in that. This bombardment began and many were killed and injured and others were terrorized and displaced.

I couldn't forget those moving scenes, blood and severed limbs, women and children sprawled everywhere. Houses destroyed along with their occupants and high rises demolished over their residents, rockets raining down on our home without mercy.

The situation was like a crocodile meeting a helpless child, powerless except for his screams. Does the crocodile understand a conversation that doesn't include a weapon? And the whole world saw and heard but it didn't respond.

In those difficult moments many hard-to-describe ideas bubbled in my soul, but in the end they produced an intense feeling of rejection of tyranny, and gave birth to a strong resolve to punish the oppressors.

And as I looked at those demolished towers in Lebanon, it entered my mind that we should punish the oppressor in kind and that we should destroy towers in America in order that they taste some of what we tasted and so that they be deterred from killing our women and children.

And that day, it was confirmed to me that oppression and the intentional killing of innocent women and children is a deliberate American policy. Destruction is freedom and democracy, while resistance is terrorism and intolerance.

This means the oppressing and embargoing to death of millions as Bush Sr. did in Iraq in the greatest mass slaughter of children mankind has ever known, and it means the throwing of millions of pounds of bombs and explosives at millions of children ' also in Iraq ' as Bush Jr. Did, in order to remove an old agent and replace him with a new puppet to assist in the pilfering of Iraq's oil and other outrages.

So with these images and their like as their background, the events of September 11th came as a reply to those great wrongs, should a man be blamed for defending his sanctuary?

Is defending oneself and punishing the aggressor in kind, objectionable terrorism? If it is such, then it is unavoidable for us.

This is the message which I sought to communicate to you in word and deed, repeatedly, for years before September 11th.

And you can read this, if you wish, in my interview with Scott in Time Magazine in 1996, or with Peter Arnett on CNN in 1997, or my meeting with John Weiner in 1998.

You can observe it practically, if you wish, in Kenya and Tanzania and in Aden. And you can read it in my interview with Abdul Bari Atwan, as well as my interviews with Robert Fisk.

The latter is one of your compatriots and co-religionists and I consider him to be neutral. So are the pretenders of freedom at The White House and the channels controlled by them able to run an interview with him? So that he may relay to the American people what he has understood from us to be the reasons for our fight against you?

If you were to avoid these reasons, you will have taken the correct path that will lead America to the security that it was in before September 11th. This concerned the causes of the war.

As for it's results, they have been, by the grace of Allah, positive and enormous, and have, by all standards, exceeded all expectations. This is due to many factors, chief amongst them, that we have found it difficult to deal with the Bush administration in light of the resemblance it bears to the regimes in our countries, half of which are ruled by the military and the other half which are ruled by the sons of kings and presidents.

Our experience with them is lengthy, and both types are replete with those who are characterized by pride, arrogance, greed and misappropriation of wealth. This resemblance began after the visits of Bush Sr. to the region.

At a time when some of our compatriots were dazzled by America and hoping that these visits would have an effect on our countries, all of a sudden he was affected by those monarchies and military regimes, and became envious of their remaining decades in their positions, to embezzle the public wealth of the nation without supervision or accounting.

So he took dictatorship and suppression of freedoms to his son and they named it the Patriot Act, under the pretense of fighting terrorism. In addition, Bush sanctioned the installing of sons as state governors, and didn't forget to import expertise in election fraud from the region's presidents to Florida to be made use of in moments of difficulty.

All that we have mentioned has made it easy for us to provoke and bait this administration. All that we have to do is to send two Mujahideen to the furthest point East to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al-Qaida, in order to make the generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic, and political losses without their achieving for it anything of note other than some benefits for their private companies.

This is in addition to our having experience in using guerrilla warfare and the war of attrition to fight tyrannical superpowers, as we, alongside the Mujahideen, bled Russia for ten years, until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in defeat.

All Praise is due to Allah.

So we are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah.

That being said, those who say that al-Qaida has won against the administration in the White House or that the administration has lost in this war have not been precise, because when one scrutinizes the results, one cannot say that al-Qaida is the sole factor in achieving those spectacular gains.

Rather, the policy of the White House that demands the opening of war fronts to keep busy their various corporations ' whether they be working in the field of arms or oil or reconstruction ' has helped al-Qaida to achieve these enormous results.

And so it has appeared to some analysts and diplomats that the White House and us are playing as one team towards the economic goals of the United States, even if the intentions differ.

And it was to these sorts of notions and their like that the British diplomat and others were referring in their lectures at the Royal Institute of International Affairs. (When they pointed out that) for example, al-Qaida spent $500 000 on the event, while America, in the incident and its aftermath, lost ' according to the lowest estimate ' more than 500 billion dollars.

Meaning that every dollar of al-Qaida defeated a million dollars by the permission of Allah, besides the loss of a huge number of jobs.

As for the size of the economic deficit, it has reached record astronomical numbers estimated to total more than a trillion dollars.

And even more dangerous and bitter for America is that the Mujahideen recently forced Bush to resort to emergency funds to continue the fight in Afghanistan and Iraq, which is evidence of the success of the blee-until-bankruptcy plan ' with Allah's permission.

It is true that this shows that al-Qaida has gained, but on the other hand, it shows that the Bush administration has also gained, something of which anyone who looks at the size of the contracts acquired by the shady Bush administration-linked mega-corporations, like Haliburton and its kind, will be convinced. And it all shows that the real loser is...you.

It is the American people and their economy. And for the record, we had agreed with the Commander-General Muhammad Ataa, Allah have mercy on him, that all the operations should be carried out within twenty minutes, before Bush and his administration notice.

It never occurred to us that the commander-in-chief of the American armed forces would abandon 50 000 of his citizens in the twin towers to face those great horrors alone, the time when they most needed him.

But because it seemed to him that occupying himself by talking to the little girl about the goat and its butting was more important than occupying himself with the planes and their butting of the skyscrapers. We were given three times the period required to execute the operations ' All Praise is Due to Allah.

And it's no secret to you that the thinkers and perceptive ones from among the Americans warned Bush before the war and told him, "All that you want for securing America and removing the weapons of mass destruction ' assuming they exist ' is available to you, and the nations of the world are with you in the inspections, and it is in the interest of America that it not be thrust into an unjustified war with an unknown outcome."

But the darkness of the black gold blurred his vision and insight, and he gave priority to private interests over the public interests of America.

So the war went ahead, the death toll rose, the American economy bled, and Bush became embroiled in the swamps of Iraq that threaten his future. He fits the saying, "Like the naughty she-goat who used her hoof to dig up a knife from under the earth"

So I say to you, over 15 000 of our people have been killed and tens of thousands injured, while more than a thousand of you have been killed and more than 10 000 injured. And Bush's hands are stained with the blood of all those killed from both sides, all for the sake of oil and keeping their private companies in business.

Be aware that it is the nation who punishes the weak man when he causes the killing of one of its citizens for money, while letting the powerful one get off, when he causes the killing of more than 1000 of its sons, also for money.

And the same goes for your allies in Palestine. They terrorize the women and children, and kill and capture the men as they lie sleeping with their families on the mattresses, that you may recall that for every action, there is a r eaction.

Finally, it behooves you to reflect on the last wills and testaments of the thousands who left you on the 11th as they gestured in despair. They are important testaments, which should be studied and researched.

Among the most important of what I read in them was some prose in their gestures before the collapse, where they say, "How mistaken we were to have allowed the White House to implement its aggressive foreign policies against the weak without supervision." It is as if they were telling you, the people of America, "Hold to account those who have caused us to be killed, and happy is he who learns from others' mistakes," And among that which I read in their gestures is a verse of poetry, "Injustice chases its people, and how unhealthy the bed of tyranny."

As has been said, "An ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure."

And know that, "It is better to return to the truth than persist in error." And that the wise man doesn't squander his security, wealth and children for the sake of the liar in the White House.

In conclusion, I tell you in truth, that your security is not in the hands of Kerry, nor Bush, nor al-Qaida. No.

Your security is in your own hands. And every state that doesn't play with our security has automatically guaranteed its own security.

And Allah is our Guardian and Helper, while you have no Guardian or Helper. All Peace be Upon he who follows the Guidance