Tuesday, November 30, 2004

An Interesting Endorsement Epiphany

First Hulk Hogan, Now Ric Flair
It's been a while since I've done a less-than-serious post, so let me just take a few moments to talk about something I just observed about myself.

This election cycle is the second one in a row I've endorsed a wrestler for president. Back in 2000, I recently found out by reading my own diary, I came out in support of Hulk Hogan for president in January or so (there were no actual active campaigns being run by myself throughout the year like there were this year though).

And, as many of you regulars know, I came out in support of Ric Flair for president this year. (I was even written up in about a bazillion publications by Professor Wrestling).

What does this mean?  I mean, in both cases I was unable to actually garner any support for my stated candidates, nor did the system allow me to vote for them.  I ended up voting for Pat Buchanon in 2000 and Badnarik this time around.

I promise, I'm not a non-conformist for the sake of being one.  I guess I have just been cynical about the establishment for longer than I remember.

In Other News
I had a bizarre night's sleep last night.  I went to sleep watching CSPAN's Michael Medved telling me about how it's bad for the family unit to go to sleep watching TV each night (talk about irony or something), and I woke up from a very vivid dream of something I can't remember to a cardinal (you know, the red bird) slamming himself repeatedly into my window right around 6:45 AM.

Usually I don't wake up for anything (I've been known to sleep through fire alarms before), but the sound it made strikingly resembled the sound that people make when they try to get my attention in the mornings when a network emergency happens.  That, combined with the pity for the dumb animal for the damage it must be doing to its bird brain caused me to get up and shoo it away.  It returned, however, within a couple minutes, so a routine of me getting up every few minutes and chasing it off.

I finally had the bright idea to open the Florida window thing so it might not see it's reflection anymore and stop flying into it.  It worked to a point.  Instead of flying into it, it would alternate from landing on the window and landing on the fence and chirping the whole time. 

Is it generally considered a good omen to have birds trying to crash into your window? I didn't get a good vibe from it, but it could be because I'm a server monk and not a nature person.  Who knows?

In Actual News
Tom Ridge resigned today.  I'm oh so very glad.

Ridge submitted his resignation in writing to President Bush on Tuesday morning but indicated he will continue to serve until Feb. 1. "I will always be grateful for his call to service," Ridge said.

Ridge, a politician by nature, fought criticism leading up to the election from those who said he was using terror warnings to boost support for Bush. Ridge repeatedly said: "We don't do politics in the Department of Homeland Security."

Politics, maybe not.  Calls to end essential civil liberties, certainly.

This was one of the events I was waiting for that would give me a little bit of confidence that Bush was not in fact evil and in the habit of surrounding himself with evil men.

The last person I'm waiting for to resign is his Secretary of the Navy, Gorden Englund.  I have my reasons.  Gordon is not a good man.

/rizzn

Chat Log of the Day:
jamesinwylie: where is the content manager thing??????
Rizzn: OMG!!!?!?!
Rizzn: don't freak out man
jamesinwylie: what?
jamesinwylie: just waiting on it.. got lots of work to do...
Rizzn: jamesinwylie: where is the content manager thing??????
Rizzn: got enough question marks there?
Rizzn: one pretty much does the job, y'know.
jamesinwylie: piss off.
jamesinwylie: ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Monday, November 29, 2004

Bush Arrest in Canada: the Facts

Despite the fact that rizzn.com and our associated media outlets are sometimes lighthearted and occasionally tongue-in-cheek, sometimes an allegation is leveled or a fact is cited that will require clarification or even correction. Now is one of those times.

There has been much controversy regarding President Bush and the Iraqi action from the get go, and with the President scheduled to visit Halifax on Wednesday, it has caused liberals and anti-war protesters to fantasize [link] about the legality of the President's action as well as the plausibility of George Bush being arrested under Canada's Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes Act [link].

Last night, during the Mark and Darrell show, regular caller/heckler Richard called up and brought this controversy to our attention. During the discussion, Richard alleged the in addition to the story being in the news, the CSIS mentioned somewhere that they had plans to arrest President Bush during his visit to Canada. This sounded fantastic, and had to be investigated.

At the risk of having yet another intelligence file opened up on my person, I called the media relations department of the CSIS to have them confirm or deny these allegations. I was promptly transferred around 2:00 PM EST to the media relations department, but unfortunately they didn't have a quick answer, nor apparently a ready knowlege of the allegation, or even the event (the person who preferred not to share her name, had no information on the President's visit, not to mention the allegations I brought to her).

Around 3:00 PM EST, Nicole Currier at Media Relations for the CSIS returned my call with an official statement regarding the matter. They in fact were aware of President Bush's arrival to Halifax, but were confused about the allegations I brought to them regarding the arrest. They were able to pull up the Thomas Walkom article from the Toronto Star regarding the feasibility of a Bush Arrest. I restated Richard's allegation (which was backed up by a Fox News story) that if President Bush were to disembark from the plane on Wednesday with military escort, then he would be arrested on site.

Currier responded by saying "such an action, first of all, doesn't fall under jurisdiction or mandate for our organisation." She further stated that "there was no public statement regarding the matter nor an anonymous nor private statement they are aware of."

The interesting part is not only that Canadians were and are under the impression that this would take place but that Fox News also reported yesterday that Bush would be arrested upon disembarking from Air Force One in Halifax. Rizzn.com researchers were unable to find a transcript of the televised report on their website, but more than one listener of the Mark and Darrell Show independantly confirmed via email that they also caught the report on FoxNews Television.

Further inquiries are being made today to other Canadian intelligence and law enforcement agencies regarding allegations, in the case that everyone mis-heard the agency mentioned in the various reports.

If in fact Fox News reported inaccurately that President Bush would be arrested on arrival to Canada, it would be yet another glaring inaccuracy caused by bias to mar the record of Old Media organisations in their news reporting abilities (ala the Halperin Memo [abc] or Memogate [cbs]).

/rizzn

Saturday, November 20, 2004

FlyDLUX Update

[Rizzn's Note: I got this from George Conner, counsel for FlyDLUX.]

Forrest, on Tuesday of this week, for the first time, I located the old divorce decree for James Wimmer's parents. On Wednesday, I sent Lawrence E. Finkelstein to Ft. Worth to get the documents yesterday. Of course the old decree had the family names and social security numbers. Although all of the contracts list James Wimmer's mother as Linda Meccurro, who died and left a large estate for him and various trusts, her real name is Sharon E. Wimmer and I called her today. I prepared a memo about our conversation, and the memo is attached hereto.

I learned of these things for the first time this afternoon. Lawrence E. Finkelstein learned of these things for the first time this afternoon. This has all happened in the last hour, and I think Larry is in shock at the moment. Let me say it again, Larry just found out these things when I called Sharon Wimmer.

George Conner



Memo

In the past 48 hours, new facts about James Dow Wimmer have been uncovered and this memo will attempt to set them out.

James Dow Wimmer
TxDL: 0090606884
SSN: 326-60-2140
DOB 12-14-1970

James was born in Detroit, has one brother named Jeffrey Wimmer, and has no other siblings.

Jeffrey Wimmer
SSN: 449-55-0951
DOB: 4/15/1974.

James’ mother is Sharon E. Wimmer

Sharon E. Wimmer
SSN: 577-64-9651
DOB: 8/28/1944
8141 Gibraltar Dr.
Tuscon, AZ 85704

Sharon's telephone number is ***************. I called Sharon Wimmer this afternoon and learned that

1. She is the mother of James Dow Wimmer;
2. She never worked for American Airlines;
3. She never established any trusts for James Dow Wimmer, although she recently changed her last will and testament with regardes to James;
4. She knows that James has no assets;
5. She loaned James money recently because James was saying that he was having financial troubles and that things were bouncing all over the place;
6. She forgave the loan to James recently because things were so tough for him;
7. She said James was working in the Washington D.C. area for some nice people and that he would lose his job over this (meaning the car deals and the airline ticket deals);
8. She said she is Presbyterian, and before that Methodist; and that no one in the family is Jewish;
9. She said that some friends of James thought he looked Jewish, and that James converted to Judiasm;
10. She [WINDOWS-1252?]confirmed that James Wimmer’s telephone number is 410-977-8236;
11. She said that when she was 4 years of age, she was in an automobile accident, and suffered a blow to the right temporal lobe of her brain; as a result she suffered a memory loss, seizures, and emotional swings; only recently did the new medication catch up to her medical problem and make things significantly better.
12. She said that James has no sister named Stephanie, but has a brother named Jeffrey;
13. She said that James was never called Tony by the family and did not know to whom I was referring when I used the name Tony; 14. She said that James father is Stanley Wimmer, whose SSN: 235-58-5174, dob: 7/2/1937,and resides at 4116 Brookmore, Arlington, Texas and whose telephone number is ***************;
15. She said [WINDOWS-1252?]that Dorothy Paige was James’ maternal grandmother, who resided in Tuscon and is now deceased;
16. She said that she is not Linda Meccurro;
17. She seemed surprised and heartbroken by the news of the car contract problems and the airline ticket problems;
18. She [WINDOWS-1252?]called back later and said she left a message on James’ telephone and asked him to call me, which he has not done;
19. She asked me how I located her, if I thought her name was Linda Mecurro, and I told her that we found a divorce decree between her and Stanley; Cause No. 325-90905, in the 325th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, Mbook251, Page 128-151, signed September 17, 1987. gc

Don't be sucked in. Votehacking is a hoax.

[Rizzn's note: this article was actually a reply to a broadcast email by Matthew to his private mailing list.  Matthew had forwarded an article about Bev Harris and votegate.tv in their investigation of fraud in Florida] 

I have a hard time believing the words of Bev Harris for a number of reasons. This article is just too fantastic to believe, and the scope of the conspiracy she is suggesting is out of this world. Let's take a step back and examine it rationally for a moment.  Bev Harris, in the last parts of the article, did claim to be a non-partisan, non-biased person.  Let's see how true this is under critical scrutiny... 

Her 2002 book Black Box Voting alleges clear links between Republicans and all major providers of e-voting technologies.  I was considering the implications of this last week after Joel posted the article by Larry Chin of the Online Journal  in his column called "The Stolen Election of 2004: Welcome Back to Hell," a wonderfully balanced piece that asserted that Bush is a worse human than Hitler. Keep in mind, I have vastly superior experience in what software development is all about and what it takes to get a major piece of technology brought to the public when you compare me to any author that has deemed themselves worthy of imparting their wisdom so far on this matter.  I was thinking about all the developers needed to put together just the hardware, all the planning and management involved in software side, the embedded OS side, and everything else involved with making proprietary voting equipment as sophisticated as the Diebold system.  If I had to put a team together for it, I'd request at least 70 or so developers, network technicians, database managers, hardware engineers, kernel developers, and load testers.  As it turns out, 13,000 was the number of employees that Diebold used to create these systems (according the the Media Relations fellow we talked to this week).   

Granted, to put backdoors into systems, not every developer is required to know, but trust me, it's not like in the movies where one guy can put a backdoor into a system, and then he can shut everyone down with a couple keystrokes.  If that was possible, don't you think Bill Gates would have done that so he could catch all the people pirating his software?  He'd have a ball throwing all us peon pirates in jail. 

No, many many people would know about the backdoors that allow people to go in and modify votes if they existed. 

Which brings up a very valid point -- the source code to the Diebold voting machines was supposedly leaked last year some time, and there were security flaws found in that.  If you search for rob-georgia.zip on a file-sharing network or on google, you'll find both reference to it, and if you're lucky, the actual source code. 

The truth is, however, no matter if you are able to change votes in a password protected Access database or not (a task a script kiddy could handle), you still have the problem of file dates to content with, which are written by the local machine, not the uploading machine.  And if the modems were plugged into the phone lines on the Diebold voting machines, as Bev often suggests that they are, and then the Access files were then uploaded after the voting period ended, the file dates would show a time that was inconsistent with what it should show as when the last vote was cast.  Is that clear?  Let me make it a bit clearer as I think I might be making it confusing... 

Let's say from 9 am-5 pm is the voting period when votes are actively being taken in.  File dates contain both the date of the file as well as a time stamp. Now let's say that everything went all kosher, and no fraud took place. The datestamp on the Access database would be the time when the last vote was cast (in this utopian scenario, let's say it was 5:00 on the dot). 

In the fraudulent situation, there are two scenarios. A) the fraudulent database file was placed on the hard drive before or during the election process, and a batch file was hidden on the system to at the end of the day copy the file over the real database (this eventuality is very unlikely) or B) the fraudulent database file was uploaded after all voting took place, overwriting the existing database. 

In both cases, the polling station would show what should be an invalid datestemp.  No datestamp should read that polling ended at 11am,for instance, nor should it read that the last vote was cast at 6:30 pm, in this scenario. 

There then arise a couple eventualities given this data: A) the system was programmed to be fraudulent, and this programming was either endorsed by or ignored by the bulk of the 13,000 Diebold employees or B) All the election observers and poll workers in all counties don't pay attention to datestemps on the votes. 

This is a complicated explanation, highly technical, and as eager as Bev Harris is to find something wrong, I can't expect her to try to think of it, especially being a marketing person, not a technical person.  Instead, let's look to her background.  First of all, she's a marketing person, so her profession is to take an idea, figure out how to make a buck with it, and then figure out how to get as many people as possible to part with their cash for that idea.   

Let's look at what she's done... she, in 2002, had for two years been hearing the media and the left complain about Al Gore's loss and all the allegations of election fraud, as have we all (unless you've been living under a rock).  [part one, the idea]  She then started writing a book about voting and voting fraud [part two, the product], and then began marketing herself all over the place to the already willing democrats (which account for roughly 50% of the population, if the poll numbers are to be believed) using her connections in the political and media arenas [part three, the money making part]. 

So in essence, Bev Harris is just another entrepreneur, with a vested interest in you continuing to believe that elections are always being held fraudulently.  She probably doesn't care if the Republicans or the Democrats are involved, as long as there are people waiting to buy her materials and books. (and just because she also gives the book away for free doesn't convince me she's not in it for the money.  Viral marketing has proven key to many a winning business strategy since the mid-90's). 

According to Bev's biography on the disinfopedia.org entry, Bev used to run a PR company, but she has decided to focus strictly on electoral fraud, and that her and her team have filed the largest number of FOIAs in recorded history.  This fact tells me that she has created, or joined, a culture of like minded people.  If you read or listen to the audio version of my August 12th 2004 article "Training Baboons to Wipe Their Own Asses," you will learn the damaging effects of strong cultural and subcultural influence on a human's fact-finding abilities. A couple paragraphs are excerpted below

It was 1956 when Solomon Asch published a classic series of experiments in which he and his colleagues showed cards with lines of different lengths to clusters of their students. Two lines were exactly the same size and two were clearly not -- the dissimilar lines stuck out like a pair of basketball players at a Brotherhood of Munchkins brunch. During a typical experimental run, the researchers asked nine volunteers to claim that two badly mismatched lines were actually the same, and that the real twin was a misfit. Now came the nefarious part: the researchers ushered a naieve student into the room filled with the collaborators and gave him the impression that the crowd already there knew just as little as he did about what was going on. Then a white-coated psychologist passed the cards around. One by one he asked the pre-drilled shills to announce out loud which lines were alike. Each dutifully declared that two terribly unlike lines were duplicates. By the time the scientists prodded the unsuspecting newcomer to pronounce judgment; he usually went along with the bogus consensus of the crowd. In fact a full 75 percent of the clueless experimental subjects bleated in chorus with the herd. Asch ran the experiment over and over again. When he quizzed his victims of peer pressure after their ordeal was over, it turned out that many had done far more than simply going along to get along. They had actually seen the mismatched lines as equal. Their senses had been swayed more by the views of the multitude than by actuality.

To make matters worse, many of those whose vision hadn't been deceived had still become inadvertent collaborators in the praise of the emperor's new clothes. Some did it out of self-doubt. They were convinced that the facts their eyes reported were wrong, the herd was right, and that an optical illusion had tricked them into seeing things. Still others realized with total clarity which lines were identical, but lacked the nerve to utter an unpopular opinion. Conformity enforcers had tyrannized everything from visual processing to honest speech, revealing some of the mechanism which wrap and seal a crowd into a false belief.

It is possible it is this culture she's involved in that would allow her to believe her own fantastic claims. It's like that quote from The Usual Suspects, "To a cop, the explanation's always simple ... If you find a body and you think his brother did it, you're going to find out that you're right."   

Here's the most damning piece of evidence of all: the vastness implied by Bev's allegations are too fantastic to believe. Allow me to quote the original article a little bit. 

From Kathleen Wynn, a Bev Harris Associate: "I don't think you'll ever see anything like this - Bev Harris having a tug of war with an election worker over a bag of garbage, and he held onto it and she pulled on it, and it split right open, spilling out those poll tapes. They were throwing away our democracy, and Bev wasn't going to let them do it." 

Another quote: 

A November 18 call to the Volusia County Elections Office found that Elections Supervisor Deanie Lowe was unavailable and nobody was willing to speak on the record with an out-of-state reporter. However, The Daytona Beach News (in Volusia County), in a November 17th article by staff writer Christine Girardin, noted, "Harris went to the Department of Elections' warehouse on State Road 44 in DeLand on Tuesday to inspect original Nov. 2 polling place tapes, after being given a set of reprints dated Nov. 15. 

While there, Harris saw Nov. 2 polling place tapes in a garbage bag, heightening her concern about the integrity of voting records." 

The picture this article paints is that not only were there republicans involved with the scam of the election, but also people from the election board on down to the poll workers.

Allow me to quote from a different article, one posted on rizzn.com by occasional contributor, Leo Johnson:

"Those numbers would translate into 3,261 Supervisors of Elections, plus that each supervisor would have employees (ranging from 6 to thousands, each) plus each voting district would have a canvassing board with a minimum of 3 people each (from both parties and or an "independent Judge"), each state would have a Secretary of State or comptroller to oversee the results before submitting them to the US federal governments plus each party has delegates to account for each electoral vote. Let alone the 191,000 voting precincts that each has poll workers and polling observers each. That would be by conservative averages involve a total of 2,194,570 co-conspirators. (That's 652,400 SOE employees + 13,044 canvassing board members + 50 Secretaries of State + 1,076 Delegates + 1,528,000 poll place workers and observers ). Who would need rigged software? Just let the co-conspirators vote."

The alleged conspiracy is too vast.  I believe the truth is that it's impossible or more accurately highly improbable, that there is a vast right wing conspiracy, at least at the voting machine level, to keep Republicans in office.

Maybe I'm looking at this all wrong -- I ended up voting for Michael Badnarik because the e-voting system I was polled with didn't allow me to write in Ric Flair.  Who do I sue about that?  Recount my vote until Badnarik wins!  Heck, recount till Ric Flair wins! That's the spirit! 

/rizzn

Thursday, November 18, 2004

Podcasting Software

I've been a little bit scarce this week, at least to those who know me.  Let me explain.

I've been working on podcasting software custom to rizzn.com.  It's very intense, and I'll probably have a useable product after I'm done, and I'll post the source codes to the appropriate places.

I'm doing the bulk of my coding through ASP, and I'm utilizing a free internet voice mail system (the same one used on openpodcast.org), and some batch files, and some scheduled tasks, and essentially how it will work is that I'll assign a phone number to each of the contributors for rizzn.com, and they'll call it and be able to make a post that will in turn show up on the website with a name and a time of post in the podcast file.

This is step one to the Daily Rizzn.com Radio Show or something of that nature.  We'll see how it turns out.  It should be ready in a week or so.  Stay tuned, podcasters.

/rizzn

P.S. Happy birthday, Stacy!

Wednesday, November 17, 2004

Ron McGill explains the beginnings of man

[Rizzn's Note: Leo sent this to me this morning -- his cousin Ronnie McGill wrote this gem. Further side-note: If I still lived in Texas, I'd drink a domestic, but this is Florida, and there isn't a decent domestic beer here.]

Division of the human family into two distinct political groups began some 12,000 years ago. Humans existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunter/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains in the summer and would go to the beach and live on fish and lobster in winter.

The two most important events in all of history were the invention of beer and the invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer. These were the foundation of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups: Liberals and Conservatives.

Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early human ancestors were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That is how villages were formed.

Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to B-B-Q at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as "The Conservative Movement".

Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly B-B-Q's and doing the sewing, fetching and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the "Liberal Movement". Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest became known as 'girleymen'.

Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the trade union, the invention of group therapy and group hugs, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that conservatives provided.

Over the years, conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant.

Liberals are symbolized by the jackass.

Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare. Another interesting revolutionary side note: most of their women have higher testosterone levels than their men.

Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't "fair" to make the pitcher also bat.

Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, medical doctors, police officers, corporate executives, soldiers, athletes, and generally anyone who works productively outside government. Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.

Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to "govern" the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans are. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to America. they crept in after the wild west was tame and created a business of trying to get more for nothing.

Monday, November 15, 2004

Lack of updates: a comprehensive apology, and funny MADshow stuff


Rizzn is back, but not rested, it
would seem.

There has been a distinct lack of updates around here at rizzn.com, and there's good reasons for it.  Just so you aren't left completely in the dark, I'll take some time out to share with you, my loyal 10 or so readers.

First and formost, business at AACS/CyberDyne has been picking up quite well after the hurricanes.  It has actually gotten to the point where I can focus on minor infrastructure systems at the company, like the company radio station or improving fax automation and database synchronisation (instead of a hand done procedure, the affiliate database synchronises four times a day automatically with the content manager). 


Disputing and Data Entry


Laura from Disputing


The foyer and the COO's office

Secondly, the Aveary project is starting to take off.  The articles of incorporation are ready to go to press, the site is almost completed, and next Monday, we hope to do our first demo in front of a billionaire (obviously looking for investment capital). This is a big step, and due to the sensitive nature of the product, I really can't go into the specifics of what we're doing, but I can say that this will change the way the world works, once we go to market.

Thirdly, I've been getting involved with podcasting, in conjunction with my radio shows. Along that vein of thought, we had on the Mark and Darrell show one of the rising stars in the Podcasting world, Sondra Lowell, otherwise known as the deliverer of the tapdancing podcaster news (yeah!).  Here is the 30-minute interview between Darrell, Doug, myself, and Sondra ---> (download 13.5 meg, 64k stream).

In other miscellaneous things, I'm upgrading the site to version 7.7 here within the next few days.  Joel and Matthew (currently known as DJ Colonoscopy and the Sh!t) wish to upgrade their credibility a little bit, as they've been making some amazing contacts and working on some comprehensive stories, and everyone keeps telling them that they have to drop the vulgarity in the name to be taken seriously (darn this square world).  In addition, I'm adding a podcasting category to the front page, adding RSS feeds, dropping ndmovies and whatever, and then combing them and a few others into a community blog.  Also, I'm in talks with a few "unsigned" bloggers/podcasters in attempts to lure them over to the rizzn.com community.

Lest I forget to plug this again, New Media News Network is still in active development.  Darrell and I are nearly completely done with pre-production work, and we will very shortly being talks with podcasters in an attempt to sign them up to join. 

Well, in about thirty seconds, the COO is going to be breathing down my neck and notice my non-productivity, so I'm going to finish up this entry.

Oh, for absolute hilarity, check out what has to be the funniest moment in recent history of the MADshow here due to James being drunk and calling in ---> (download 949 KB. 64k stream).

/rizzn

Tuesday, November 9, 2004

washingtonpost.com: Fight Over Icon Has Plenty of Precedent

washingtonpost.com: Fight Over Icon Has Plenty of Precedent

Fight Over Icon Has Plenty of Precedent
Deputies to Arafat Have Long Seen His Wife as Threat
By Molly Moore
Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, November 9, 2004; Page A18


JERUSALEM, Nov. 8 -- They seemed mismatched from the start: The young bride, Suha Tawil, wore flashy designer clothes. The bridegroom, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, was scruffy and grizzled in rumpled combat fatigues. She was a Greek Orthodox Christian, he a Sunni Muslim. He was a legend, the very symbol of the Palestinian people. She was one of his secretaries -- and less than half his age.

She dyed her hair blond in a society of black-haired people, wore form-fitting dresses and pantsuits in a culture where most women drape themselves in scarves and shapeless robes, and drove her own car. All that was more than enough to make Suha Arafat suspect in the eyes of Palestinians grand and ordinary.

"It is already not easy to be a woman in the Arab world," she told the French entertainment magazine Gala in 1994. "But when you become the wife of Yasser Arafat -- a man who for so long remained single -- you are rejected."

In a power structure in which influence was measured largely by proximity to the leader, nothing was more threatening to members of the longtime bachelor's inner circle than a wife, especially a smart, Sorbonne-educated, trilingual one who loathed them and said so.

In a 1998 interview with the Spanish newspaper El Pais, she accused the men around Arafat of tarnishing his image with their "corruption, lack of integrity, a domineering attitude and the adopting of undemocratic methods." She has admonished his closest associates for building mansions while average Palestinians lived in poverty.

These days it is Suha Arafat who is accused of extravagance.

During the nearly three years that Arafat was captive inside his compound in the West Bank city of Ramallah, his wife and 9-year-old daughter reportedly lived in a multimillion-dollar Paris apartment.

British newspapers have delighted in reports of Suha Arafat's prime seats at Paris fashion shows and shopping sprees with friends such as the wife of Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi and the king of Morocco's sister.

French banking officials last year opened an investigation into allegations that $11.4 million was funneled from Palestinian bank accounts in Switzerland to two French bank accounts in Suha Arafat's name in 2002 and 2003. A Justice Ministry spokesman would not comment Monday on the inquiry's status.

When the accusations surfaced last year, Suha Arafat posed a question to Al Hayat, a London-based Arabic-language newspaper: What was strange about Arafat "sending money to his wife overseas, especially when I handle Palestinian matters and interests?"

Suha Tawil was introduced to Yasser Arafat by her mother, Ramonda Tawil, a prominent Palestinian activist and writer. Suha Tawil helped arrange one of his trips to Paris while she was studying politics at the Sorbonne. A few months later Arafat offered her a job on his personal staff in Tunis, where he was living at the time. They married on July 17, 1990.

She has described her first years of marriage as lonely and difficult. She has told Vogue magazine that her husband once compared her to the former Philippine first lady, Imelda Marcos, after seeing her vast shoe collection.

When the couple arrived in the Gaza Strip in 1994 after the Oslo peace accords allowed the Palestinian leader's return, Arafat was content to share their home with aides and Kalashnikov-toting bodyguards, until his wife persuaded him to add a more private second floor. But after she decorated the three-bedroom flat, Arafat said it reminded him of a cabaret and returned to his spare quarters on the first floor, she told the New York Times in 1999. She remained upstairs.

"Luxury is in your father's banker's home, not mine," he cautioned his wife in a reference to her father's banking career, she told the London Observer.

Suha Arafat converted to Islam and tried to win over the Palestinian people by working in behalf of women and children. But as the birth of her daughter drew near in 1995, she undercut her efforts by announcing she would have the baby in Paris because, she said, hospital conditions in Gaza were unsanitary.

Correspondent Glenn Frankel in Paris contributed to this report.

FN Radio

I had a particularly productive night last.  I finished doing the initial setup for FNRadio/Skynet Radio, my company's radio station.  Essentially, the desire for the station came from the need to share our tunes across the network.  It seems that I've become the offical company DJ, since in our close quarters at the old office everyone grew accustomed to listening to my tunes blaring from my computer, and now that everyone's all spread out and such, it makes it difficult to hear anything except from one's own machine.  The problem is if everyone plays different music, it sounds cacaughonous in the office.

So essentially, I got everyone playing from the same song-sheet.

As it turns out, I've done something good here with the station.  It's been up for a day, and I've already over 47 listeners -- wacky, eh?  AKA radio could never manage more than 14.

If you want to listen/request music, go to http://aacs.kicks-ass.net/fnradio/playing.html - the site's not exactly done, but it is functional.

/rizzn

Music on the Turntables Currently: leftfield - open up (FN Radio: Smooth Sounds of SkyNet)

Monday, November 8, 2004

Bush is a Sumbitch

This is an excerpt from last weeks Mark and Darrell Show ... Andrew Veal called in about his attempted suicide in protest of Bush's win in the election.

/rizzn

Sunday, November 7, 2004

Modern Political Liberalism - the new bigotry

[Rizzn's Note: It's getting bad in here.  By in here, I am referring to our country of America.  By getting bad, I refer to what I have taken to calling liberal bigotry.

I'm not going to go into a great definition of liberal bigotry.  Instead I'm going to tell you a story that sparked me on this journey, and then I'm going to simply post some quotes up here from common liberal newspapers and sources, as well as some random blogs.

A few weeks ago, I watched the VEEP debates.  I commented on them, and my comments were favorable to Dick Cheney.  I posted these comments up on the RantRadio forum.  Then along came an idiot named gManiaxe.  He decided he was going to goad me into an argument/flame-war by calling my ideas and judgement laughable ("it is hilarious that you think that ...").

I really thought about how indicative this is of the liberal bigotry going on in America today -- a whole presidential campaign was just waged on that idea.

I'm not going to wax philisophical about it just this minute; instead i'll let these other, more accomplished writers, do my talking for me.]

U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown verbally attacked a top Bush administration official during a briefing on the Haiti crisis Wednesday, calling the President's policy on the beleaguered nation "racist" and his representatives "a bunch of white men."

Brown sat directly across the table from Noriega and yelled into a microphone. Her comments sent a hush over the hourlong meeting, which was attended by about 30 people, including several members of Congress and Bush administration officials.

Noriega later told Brown: "As a Mexican-American, I deeply resent being called a racist and branded a white man," according to three participants.

Brown then told him "you all look alike to me," the participants said.

February 25, Miami Sun-Sentinel



Here in Massachusetts, especially in places like Cambridge, it’s all too common to hear people talk about conservative minorities in terms that are patently racist.  What’s galling of course, is the reflexive attitude that all conservatives are racists who want to turn the clock back to segregation and slavery.  If their own behavior gets pointed out to them, they talk about Trent Lott, conveniently forgetting both their own klansman Bobby Byrd and the fact that the GOP forced Lott to resign as Senate majority leader.  You see, it isn’t our plantation (never was) - it’s their plantation.  And the likes of Ted Rall and Ted Kennedy get mighty upset when the fieldhands get uppity. 

July 8, MartiniPundit



It's encouraging that the right is less hostile to gays and lesbians than it used to be. President Bush argued in his 1994 run for governor that gay sex should be illegal, while now he feels comfortable hitting up gays for campaign contributions.

On the other hand, the left seems more contemptuous than ever of evangelicals. Sensitive liberals who avoid expressions like "ghetto blaster," because that might be racially offensive, blithely dismiss conservative Christians as "Jesus freaks" or "fanatics."

Take Ted Turner. He has called Christianity a "religion for losers" and once ridiculed CNN employees observing Ash Wednesday as "Jesus freaks." Later, he apologized.

Granted, the Bible denounces male homosexuality, although it strikes me as inconsistent not to execute people who work on the Sabbath (Exodus 35:2) and not to crack down on those who get haircuts (Leviticus 19:27) or wear clothes with more than one kind of thread (Leviticus 19:19).

But there's no clear objection in the Bible to lesbianism at all. And since some fundamentalists have argued that AIDS is God's punishment for gay men, it's worth noting that lesbians are at less risk of AIDS than straight women. So if God is smiting gay men for their sin, is he rewarding lesbians for their holiness?

Those kinds of pointed questions are fair, but sneering is not. And in polite society, conservative Christians — especially Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses — are among the last groups it's still acceptable to mock.

This resentment is global. In a Tyndale Lecture in England last year, Cristina Odone complained: "The chattering classes . . . pride themselves on being tolerant. . . . Yet they share one prejudice that turns them into rabid persecutors: Christians."

Liberals often protest that they would have nothing against conservative Christians if they were not led by hypocritical blowhards who try to impose their Ten Commandments plaques, sexual mores and creationism on society. But that's a crude stereotype, and it ignores the Christian right's accomplishments. Polls show that evangelical Christians are more likely to contribute to charities that help the needy, and in horror spots in Africa Catholics and other Christians are the bulwark of the health care system.

Moreover, saying that one will tolerate evangelicals who do not evangelize — well, that's like Christians saying they have nothing against gays who remain celibate.

April 24, New York Times



I'm just fed up with the rampant hypocrisy coming from a good portion of the left, particularly those who feel the need to take the most extreme elements of conservatism and use them to tar the entire conservative community while simulaneously denying that the extreme leftists are a part of the left. It's hypocrisy, pure and simple. Yes, there are whack jobs on the right, but they do not represent the views of the majority of conservatives; that's why they are called extremists. Get it?

Probably not.

June 17 2003, Shots Across the Bow



What are the truths of liberalism? Good Hate is Love.  The Liberal cause is Good, Perfect, and Correct, incapable of error or guilt.  Liberal Intolerance of Intolerance is not Intolerance;  Liberal Hatred of Hatred is not Hatred. Liberal Bigotry against Bigotry is not Bigotry.  Good Hate is the Righteous Anger of the Democrat.

Trilobyte Magazine: The Liberal Catechism
http://www.trilobyte-mag.com/catechism.htm

Thursday, November 4, 2004

Episode III: Revenge of the Sith

The trailer for EPIII is out.  I'd put it on my server for download (if I were feeling suicidal about the damn box), so instead I post the BitTorrent Link: http://www.numbski.net/downloads/sw3trailer.torrent

If you don't have bittorrent, then you'll just hafta wait until the starwars.com servers come back to life after being slashdotted.

I watched the trailer just now, and I must say, I think the prequel franchise might just have redeemed itself.  Remember that warm fuzzy feeling of hope you got when you saw Matrix Reloaded/Revolutions trailers for the first time?

Prepare yourself.

/rizzn

Wednesday, November 3, 2004

It's called a GOOD START!

Last night, or early this morning (depending on your perspective) right around 3:25AM, it was announced that there were 3500 Kerry supporting lawyers waiting to help him challenge the election results in Ohio.  These are just the lawyers in Cincinatti and the Ohio area -- this doesn't count the additional lawyers being shuttled in around the country (like the ones Kerry intends to bring in on the Red Sox airplane).

Where other people see a post-election quagmire, I see opportunity.  Keep in mind that these are not just lawyers, but Kerry supporters, too. Remember that joke: "What do you call 100,000 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean? A good start."

I think my point is clear.

/rizzn

Tuesday, November 2, 2004

Something Smells Rotten in Kerryland (bin Ladin text included)

Below my comments here is the full transcript of the bin Ladin speech, transcribed yesterday by AlJazeera news. I want to pull out some selected statements that I think are particularly interesting.

Take this quote: 'Even though we are in the fourth year after the events of September 11th, Bush is still engaged in distortion, deception and hiding from you the real causes. And thus, the reasons are still there for a repeat of what occurred.
http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/releases/pr_2004_0311c.html

Compare it to this John Kerry quote: "The Bush Cheney Campaign uses Weapons of Deception and Distortion because they can't have an honest debate about jobs and taxes"

Bin Ladin again: "This is due to many factors, chief amongst them, that we have found it difficult to deal with the Bush administration in light of the resemblance it bears to the regimes in our countries, half of which are ruled by the military and the other half which are ruled by the sons of kings and presidents."

Compare it to this quote from John Kerry's website: "I too believe that the Bush Regime has lied to America, bullied the world and destroyed the economy. We must have change and it must come now."
http://www.johnkerry.com/communities/republicans/testimonials.html

Even more chilling:"It is true that this shows that al-Qaida has gained, but on the other hand, it shows that the Bush administration has also gained, something of which anyone who looks at the size of the contracts acquired by the shady Bush administration-linked mega-corporations, like Haliburton and its kind, will be convinced. And it all shows that the real loser is...you. "

Kerry said, likewise: "George Bush and Dick Cheney don't fight to keep your jobs here because they want to help their friends at the top. They are not on your side. Their tax cuts have not helped the middle class. Instead, they've helped people like their friends at Halliburton. "
http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/speeches/spc_2004_1002.html

He also said this: "He should use more Iraqi contractors and workers, instead of big corporations like Halliburton."
http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/speeches/spc_2004_0920.html

Taking a page from Michael Moore and Bill Maher, bin Ladin says: "It is the American people and their economy. And for the record, we had agreed with the Commander-General Muhammad Ataa, Allah have mercy on him, that all the operations should be carried out within twenty minutes, before Bush and his administration notice. "

But peep this quote by Kerry: "Earlier, addressing minority journalists in the nation's capital, Kerry was asked what he would have done as president the moment he received word of the World Trade Center attacks. Bush spent seven minutes at a Florida elementary school after his chief of staff, Andrew Card, whispered, ''America is under attack,'' as TV cameras recorded the anxious scene."
http://www.suntimes.com/output/elect/cst-nws-elec06.html

Now, as I've said before, from personal experience, the President's compadres are mostly scumbags. I have no direct dealings with the President in my past, but I have dealt with his secretary of the Navy, and several other family friends before, and they've always tried to screw me and my associates over, legally or illegally if necessary. This is why I won't vote for him.

But the stinking smell I've been catching whiff of from the Kerry camp ensures that I won't vote for him either. Today I identified where I had smelled his skunky scent before -- Osama bin Ladin.

Here's the original unedited transcript of bin Ladin's speech:

Praise be to Allah who created the creation for his worship and commanded them to be just and permitted the wronged one to retaliate against the oppressor in kind. To proceed:

Peace be upon he who follows the guidance: People of America this talk of mine is for you and concerns the ideal way to prevent another Manhattan, and deals with the war and its causes and results.

Before I begin, I say to you that security is an indispensable pillar of human life and that free men do not forfeit their security, contrary to Bush's claim that we hate freedom. If so, then let him explain to us why we don't strike for example ' Sweden? And we know that freedom-haters don't possess defiant spirits like those of the 19 ' may Allah have mercy on them.

No, we fight because we are free men who don't sleep under oppression. We want to restore freedom to our nation, just as you lay waste to our nation. So shall we lay waste to yours.

No-one except a dumb thief plays with the security of others and then makes himself believe he will be secure. Whereas thinking people, when disaster strikes, make it their priority to look for its causes, in order to prevent it happening again.

But I am amazed at you. Even though we are in the fourth year after the events of September 11th, Bush is still engaged in distortion, deception and hiding from you the real causes. And thus, the reasons are still there for a repeat of what occurred.

So I shall talk to you about the story behind those events and shall tell you truthfully about the moments in which the decision was taken, for you to consider.

I say to you, Allah knows that it had never occurred to us to strike the towers. But after it became unbearable and we witnessed the oppression and tyranny of the American/Israeli coalition against our people in Palestine and Lebanon, it came to my mind.

The events that affected my soul in a direct way started in 1982 when America permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American Sixth Fleet helped them in that. This bombardment began and many were killed and injured and others were terrorized and displaced.

I couldn't forget those moving scenes, blood and severed limbs, women and children sprawled everywhere. Houses destroyed along with their occupants and high rises demolished over their residents, rockets raining down on our home without mercy.

The situation was like a crocodile meeting a helpless child, powerless except for his screams. Does the crocodile understand a conversation that doesn't include a weapon? And the whole world saw and heard but it didn't respond.

In those difficult moments many hard-to-describe ideas bubbled in my soul, but in the end they produced an intense feeling of rejection of tyranny, and gave birth to a strong resolve to punish the oppressors.

And as I looked at those demolished towers in Lebanon, it entered my mind that we should punish the oppressor in kind and that we should destroy towers in America in order that they taste some of what we tasted and so that they be deterred from killing our women and children.

And that day, it was confirmed to me that oppression and the intentional killing of innocent women and children is a deliberate American policy. Destruction is freedom and democracy, while resistance is terrorism and intolerance.

This means the oppressing and embargoing to death of millions as Bush Sr. did in Iraq in the greatest mass slaughter of children mankind has ever known, and it means the throwing of millions of pounds of bombs and explosives at millions of children ' also in Iraq ' as Bush Jr. Did, in order to remove an old agent and replace him with a new puppet to assist in the pilfering of Iraq's oil and other outrages.

So with these images and their like as their background, the events of September 11th came as a reply to those great wrongs, should a man be blamed for defending his sanctuary?

Is defending oneself and punishing the aggressor in kind, objectionable terrorism? If it is such, then it is unavoidable for us.

This is the message which I sought to communicate to you in word and deed, repeatedly, for years before September 11th.

And you can read this, if you wish, in my interview with Scott in Time Magazine in 1996, or with Peter Arnett on CNN in 1997, or my meeting with John Weiner in 1998.

You can observe it practically, if you wish, in Kenya and Tanzania and in Aden. And you can read it in my interview with Abdul Bari Atwan, as well as my interviews with Robert Fisk.

The latter is one of your compatriots and co-religionists and I consider him to be neutral. So are the pretenders of freedom at The White House and the channels controlled by them able to run an interview with him? So that he may relay to the American people what he has understood from us to be the reasons for our fight against you?

If you were to avoid these reasons, you will have taken the correct path that will lead America to the security that it was in before September 11th. This concerned the causes of the war.

As for it's results, they have been, by the grace of Allah, positive and enormous, and have, by all standards, exceeded all expectations. This is due to many factors, chief amongst them, that we have found it difficult to deal with the Bush administration in light of the resemblance it bears to the regimes in our countries, half of which are ruled by the military and the other half which are ruled by the sons of kings and presidents.

Our experience with them is lengthy, and both types are replete with those who are characterized by pride, arrogance, greed and misappropriation of wealth. This resemblance began after the visits of Bush Sr. to the region.

At a time when some of our compatriots were dazzled by America and hoping that these visits would have an effect on our countries, all of a sudden he was affected by those monarchies and military regimes, and became envious of their remaining decades in their positions, to embezzle the public wealth of the nation without supervision or accounting.

So he took dictatorship and suppression of freedoms to his son and they named it the Patriot Act, under the pretense of fighting terrorism. In addition, Bush sanctioned the installing of sons as state governors, and didn't forget to import expertise in election fraud from the region's presidents to Florida to be made use of in moments of difficulty.

All that we have mentioned has made it easy for us to provoke and bait this administration. All that we have to do is to send two Mujahideen to the furthest point East to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al-Qaida, in order to make the generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic, and political losses without their achieving for it anything of note other than some benefits for their private companies.

This is in addition to our having experience in using guerrilla warfare and the war of attrition to fight tyrannical superpowers, as we, alongside the Mujahideen, bled Russia for ten years, until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in defeat.

All Praise is due to Allah.

So we are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah.

That being said, those who say that al-Qaida has won against the administration in the White House or that the administration has lost in this war have not been precise, because when one scrutinizes the results, one cannot say that al-Qaida is the sole factor in achieving those spectacular gains.

Rather, the policy of the White House that demands the opening of war fronts to keep busy their various corporations ' whether they be working in the field of arms or oil or reconstruction ' has helped al-Qaida to achieve these enormous results.

And so it has appeared to some analysts and diplomats that the White House and us are playing as one team towards the economic goals of the United States, even if the intentions differ.

And it was to these sorts of notions and their like that the British diplomat and others were referring in their lectures at the Royal Institute of International Affairs. (When they pointed out that) for example, al-Qaida spent $500 000 on the event, while America, in the incident and its aftermath, lost ' according to the lowest estimate ' more than 500 billion dollars.

Meaning that every dollar of al-Qaida defeated a million dollars by the permission of Allah, besides the loss of a huge number of jobs.

As for the size of the economic deficit, it has reached record astronomical numbers estimated to total more than a trillion dollars.

And even more dangerous and bitter for America is that the Mujahideen recently forced Bush to resort to emergency funds to continue the fight in Afghanistan and Iraq, which is evidence of the success of the blee-until-bankruptcy plan ' with Allah's permission.

It is true that this shows that al-Qaida has gained, but on the other hand, it shows that the Bush administration has also gained, something of which anyone who looks at the size of the contracts acquired by the shady Bush administration-linked mega-corporations, like Haliburton and its kind, will be convinced. And it all shows that the real loser is...you.

It is the American people and their economy. And for the record, we had agreed with the Commander-General Muhammad Ataa, Allah have mercy on him, that all the operations should be carried out within twenty minutes, before Bush and his administration notice.

It never occurred to us that the commander-in-chief of the American armed forces would abandon 50 000 of his citizens in the twin towers to face those great horrors alone, the time when they most needed him.

But because it seemed to him that occupying himself by talking to the little girl about the goat and its butting was more important than occupying himself with the planes and their butting of the skyscrapers. We were given three times the period required to execute the operations ' All Praise is Due to Allah.

And it's no secret to you that the thinkers and perceptive ones from among the Americans warned Bush before the war and told him, "All that you want for securing America and removing the weapons of mass destruction ' assuming they exist ' is available to you, and the nations of the world are with you in the inspections, and it is in the interest of America that it not be thrust into an unjustified war with an unknown outcome."

But the darkness of the black gold blurred his vision and insight, and he gave priority to private interests over the public interests of America.

So the war went ahead, the death toll rose, the American economy bled, and Bush became embroiled in the swamps of Iraq that threaten his future. He fits the saying, "Like the naughty she-goat who used her hoof to dig up a knife from under the earth"

So I say to you, over 15 000 of our people have been killed and tens of thousands injured, while more than a thousand of you have been killed and more than 10 000 injured. And Bush's hands are stained with the blood of all those killed from both sides, all for the sake of oil and keeping their private companies in business.

Be aware that it is the nation who punishes the weak man when he causes the killing of one of its citizens for money, while letting the powerful one get off, when he causes the killing of more than 1000 of its sons, also for money.

And the same goes for your allies in Palestine. They terrorize the women and children, and kill and capture the men as they lie sleeping with their families on the mattresses, that you may recall that for every action, there is a r eaction.

Finally, it behooves you to reflect on the last wills and testaments of the thousands who left you on the 11th as they gestured in despair. They are important testaments, which should be studied and researched.

Among the most important of what I read in them was some prose in their gestures before the collapse, where they say, "How mistaken we were to have allowed the White House to implement its aggressive foreign policies against the weak without supervision." It is as if they were telling you, the people of America, "Hold to account those who have caused us to be killed, and happy is he who learns from others' mistakes," And among that which I read in their gestures is a verse of poetry, "Injustice chases its people, and how unhealthy the bed of tyranny."

As has been said, "An ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure."

And know that, "It is better to return to the truth than persist in error." And that the wise man doesn't squander his security, wealth and children for the sake of the liar in the White House.

In conclusion, I tell you in truth, that your security is not in the hands of Kerry, nor Bush, nor al-Qaida. No.

Your security is in your own hands. And every state that doesn't play with our security has automatically guaranteed its own security.

And Allah is our Guardian and Helper, while you have no Guardian or Helper. All Peace be Upon he who follows the Guidance