
My Buddy Rick. Krystin took this picture -- actually got his face on this one! Ha ha!
Brazil Moves Away From Microsoft
Kasparov Wins Game 3 Against X3D Fritz
by timothy (30% noise)
View Skip
Vulcao writes “Garry Kasparov just brilliantly won game 3 in the Kasparov vs. X3D Fritz chess match, which pits man against machine. Kasparov created a positional advantage on the queen side with a very strong pawn structure to which Fritz didn’t have an answer. The result is now 1.5 - 1.5, and the last game will be this Tuesday, Nov. 18.”
maybe Kasparov should be an Action Ranger
by dandelion_wine (Score: 5, Funny) Thread
Al Gore: You already know Stephen Hawking. Also with us is Nichelle Nichols a.k.a. Commander Uhura.
Nichols: Incoming transmission from MCI one rate department. It sounds like a limited time offer.
Gore: Tell them I’m in the tub! To my left you’ll recognise Gary Gygax, inventor of dungeons and dragons.
Gygax: Greetings! It’s a…[rolls dice.]…pleasure to meet you!
Gore: And our summer intern, Deep Blue. The world’s foremost chess playing computer.
Deep Blue: Bishop to knight 4.
Gore: Not all missions can be solved with chess, Deep Blue. Someday you’ll understand that.
Is Fritz learning?
by LostCluster (Score: 5, Interesting)
Thread
Does Fritz learn from today’s defeat… or could Kasparov repeat today’s win simply by repeating today’s move sequence on Tuesday?
// Now playing: Pi Soundtrack - Pi Soundtrack - (T03) Kalpol I //
Farscape is Back - by CowboyNeal (46% noise) View Skip
cioxx writes “FilmForce has substantiated rumors of Farscape, widely popular TV miniseries, returning as a standalone project with no new episode commitment attached, independent of Sci-Fi Channel.” Previously, some rumors had been flying around that the original series would be finished off in this way, but many Farscape fans are just happy to see more of the show on the way.
Re:“Widely popular” - by TTMuskrat (Score: 4, Informative) Thread
If it was widely popular, why does it have to be resurrected?
Because its cancellation was all about money and ownership of the show, not its popularity. (Kinda like the original Battlestar Galatica).
SciFi Channel (owned by USA networks) did not own the rights to the show as it was made by the Jim Henson company (who is owned by a German conglomerate whose name escapes me now). When the USA network changed leadership, they wanted shows that they made and produced to be shown so that all the monies from said show would go to them. Since this was not the case with Henson-owned Farscape, and the fact that the show was not cheap to make, USA (and SciFi) opted out of the 5th season. So now, all you get is USA network made crap programming on the SciFi channel as if the entire USA Network itself wasn’t bad enough
I really don't like how they portrayed me as a liar -- FlyDLUX piece portrays me as some sort of a crook -- I'm not a crook.


Where am I moving to? I'm moving within the area. If we were such a fraud, how come I don't have money to pay rent? Simply put, because we aren't a fraud. I haven't been paid by FlyDLUX.com since the third week I've been in Florida. As to the cause of this problem, pay attention to this website. We are going to the FBI and the appropriate DA's and AG's offices this week.BBSmates is a place to search for members of all y ...
BBSmates is a place to search for members of all your old BBSes.
[ Rizzn's Note: More on this later why it is relevant to my life -- in other words, big news a'brewin'! ]
Internet Radio To Have Global License
According to Reuters, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) has come up with a single license agreement that Internet radio broadcasters can sign to gain the right to broadcast music around the world.
Previously, online radio broadcasters, or Webcasters, had to secure approval from an alphabet soup of national collection agencies.Broadcasting a single song online to European listeners across the continent, for example, would require a Webcaster to obtain dozens of licensing contracts. . . .
Rechardt added that while the approval process has been streamlined, the old fee structure is still intact. Webcasters will still have to pay a national body a fee for songs broadcast into each individual country.
While the license has yet to be finalized, it promises to be a good private solution to the morass of global copyright law. Read the article here.
Paris Hilton sex tape Paris Hilton may want to go back to that farm on her reality show and never return. Her ex-boyfriend Rick Solomon
is telling friends that he has a pornographic home movie of him and Hilton having sex and plans to sell it on the Internet. Solomon, an online-gambling entrepreneur, briefly dated Hilton earlier this year after he separated from his wife, 90210 bad girl Shannen Doherty. Hilton insists
there's no video (despite the fact she's trying to halt the video's release) at least that she knows of. He's a complete liar and scumbag, she said.
Meanwhile, Iran's president says it's time to devote more resources to nanotechnology.
[via Howard Lovy's NanoBot]
At some point we all thought that the Internet would be the ultimate solution for learning everything about everything we ever had an interest in. Guess again. The amount of information being added every year is far beyond what we could keep up with.
UC Berkeley has completed a project to determine how much information is added to the world's data stores every year. The ability to store written material on hard drives instead of paper has greatly increased the amount of information we store.
Print, film, magnetic, and optical storage media produced about 5 exabytes of new information in 2002. Ninety-two percent of the new information was stored on magnetic media, mostly in hard disks. [...]How big is five exabytes? If digitized, the nineteen million books and other print collections in the Library of Congress would contain about ten terabytes of information; five exabytes of information is equivalent in size to the information contained in half a million new libraries the size of the Library of Congress print collections.
I didn't read this in it's entirety, but a quick glance presents some very interesting numbers. Considering 1GB drives were considered LARGE just a few of years ago, trying to comprehend an exabyte of data is mind boggling.
Via Rebecca's Pocket
US Military In Iraq Plagued By Intelligence Shortcomings
US Military In Iraq Plagued By Intelligence Shortcomings
![]() They "simply cannot fly fast enough," and as a result "the daily mortar and rocket attacks on bases and convoys became virtually undetectable to the UAVs," the report acknowledged. (Image of UAV for illustration purposes only) |
The undated report, prepared by the Center for Army Lessons Learned in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, came amid intensifying guerrilla attacks on US forces in Iraq that have brought the US death toll to at least 347 troops since the beginning of the war.
It is based on observations by two US Army investigative teams that toured Iraq, Qatar, Kuwait and Afghanistan (news - web sites) in late May and early June to assess the needs of units on the ground.
They found that troops hunting down sympathizers of ousted Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) and foreign Islamic militants often receive outdated information, which gets held up in processing and communications channels, and because of command flaws.
As many as 69 tactical reconnaissance teams have been deployed in the country since the beginning of the war, according to the report.
They were expected to deliver at least 120 intelligence reports a day, but are able to actually produce about 30.
"The lack of reports was not because of the lack of activity, but because of the lack of guidance and focus provided" by headquarters, the document said.
A high-tech communication system between units that relied on a string of top-notch laptop computers actually "hindered operations in Iraq" because "connectivity between the terminals was non-existent," the teams concluded.
Many reconnaissance units have ruined their crucially important relations with the local populations by joining so-called "door-kicker teams" that conduct searches for Baathist supporters and al-Qaeda sympathizers.
And if intelligence were available, commanders "at every echelon" had trouble figuring out how to make the best possible use of it, according to the report.
Intelligence collection is being further hindered by the lack of qualified interpreters described in the report as "a big problem" throughout the theater of operations.
"Laugh if you will, but many of the linguists with which I conversed were convenience store workers and cab drivers, most over the age of 40," observed one of the investigators, who chose to remain unidentified. "None had any previous military experience."
Their skills are so low that most are capable only "to tell the difference between a burro and a burrito," the teams pointed out.
There are also doubts about interpreters' loyalty.
The investigators noticed that interpreters often uttered no more than yes or no when the person under interrogation delivered a 10-minute diatribe.
"Who knows what agenda the interpreter has?" The report asks.
The suspicion echoes those voiced recently by US officials at the naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where the military is re-checking all translations after two interpreters, who worked with al-Qaeda suspects held at the base, had been arrested on charges of espionage and mishandling classified documents.
The Army also expressed disappointment with the performance on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) that received rave reviews during the war in Afghanistan.
They "simply cannot fly fast enough," and as a result "the daily mortar and rocket attacks on bases and convoys became virtually undetectable to the UAVs," the report acknowledged.



| Top 19 of 19 Total Search Strings | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| # | Hits | Search String | |
| 1 | 10 | 35.71% | rizzn |
| 2 | 1 | 3.57% | 'siegfried and roy' 'no longer together' |
| 3 | 1 | 3.57% | aimbot french translation |
| 4 | 1 | 3.57% | chris abraham sarasota |
| 5 | 1 | 3.57% | crawfd@yahoo.com |
| 6 | 1 | 3.57% | deepdiscountdvd.com promotion code |
| 7 | 1 | 3.57% | dr. wendy gottlieb |
| 8 | 1 | 3.57% | dye fuse korea |
| 9 | 1 | 3.57% | eddie google irc |
| 10 | 1 | 3.57% | katherine cunningham metacortechs |
| 11 | 1 | 3.57% | metacortechs passwords |
| 12 | 1 | 3.57% | metacortechs website hacks |
| 13 | 1 | 3.57% | michael jackson smooth criminal downloadable mp3 |
| 14 | 1 | 3.57% | mystery weapon zaps tanks |
| 15 | 1 | 3.57% | nanotech kabul |
| 16 | 1 | 3.57% | nikki zieringrussia |
| 17 | 1 | 3.57% | schumacher small beautiful |
| 18 | 1 | 3.57% | timeline of george bush and 9-11 |
| 19 | 1 | 3.57% | yahoo's bonanza buddy |
[Rizzn's Note: Happy Birthday Lish!]
quarter-century girl my birthday is in two weeks. celebrate with me remotely!
UAV Market to Top $10 Billion over Next Decade
Newtown - Oct 29, 2003
The market for unmanned air vehicles that perform reconnaissance and surveillance missions is expected to be worth $10.6 billion over the next 10 years, according to Forecast International's "The Market for UAV Reconnaissance Systems."
US military actions around the world have helped spark interest in unmanned air vehicles. US-operated unmanned air vehicles (UAVs) have seen action in Afghanistan, the Philippines, Yemen and most recently in Iraq.
"Each military operation has helped to push interest in UAVs up another notch," said Larry Dickerson, Unmanned Systems Analyst for Forecast International. "While interest may not stay at this level, it will remain higher than it was before these operations were launched," he said.
U. S. companies, including Northrop Grumman which makes the Global Hawk and Predator manufacturer General Atomics, will be the leading providers of unmanned air vehicles, controlling more than 50 percent of this market's total value.
These and other American companies can attribute their dominance to the Pentagon's growing demand for UAVs. Indeed, Forecast International expects the Pentagon to award U.S. companies about $5.4 billion worth of UAV-related contracts in the coming 10 years.
Still, this market is open to new entries. "Some $1.3 billion worth of new requirement contracts are up for grabs, with large and small companies from around the world expected to vie for a piece of this action," said Dickerson.
The UAV market is expected to see a slow but steady rise in its value and the number of systems produced annually. Dickerson does caution that over-enthusiasm on the part of UAV supporters could damage the long-term future of this market. "People are predicting growth trends, sometimes tens of billions of dollars higher than our own, which are simply beyond this market's ability to achieve" said Dickerson.
Although the U.S. fielded UAVs in 1960s, this market remains in its infancy. The truly massive expansion in UAV procurement will probably not occur until 2010 or later.
[Rizzn's Note: I happen to wholeheartedly disagree with the final conclusion reached by the quick commentary quoted below.
"Without getting too religious on you, life is more than a calculation. Life is more than A plus B equals C. There's an angle to life that we'll never be able to explain, much less code."
This isn't quite true. Life itself consists of what are essentially ones and zeros. Decisions that are made can be quantified on a yes/no or case statement type decision making process. Emotions can be simulated, and the effects of hormonal and other chemical imbalances accounted for by randomizing elements.
Theoretically, I can come up with a way to code anything in life. Do I have the time to do it by hand or singlehandedly? Does my processer stack up with a human brain's capacity to learn, process, or store? Sadly, the answer to this question is no on both counts. This will change in the future. If I can pseudo-code it, I can real code it. If I get a few programmers working for me, and a computer on the order of 10 or 50 times better, we can talk.
As it stands, though, we are already there as far as simulating small parts of the human experience. All we need to eventually do is start incorporating 'this' ai with 'that' ai. There are a million different intelligent programs out there. Some create art. Some creat conversation. Some crunch numbers. Some replace minimum wage workers. The point is, there are a hundred thousand different little semi-intelligent, yet not yet self-aware AI's out there. Once they are all brought together to work together, a singular consciousness has the potential to arise.]
The Semantic Web, Syllogism, and Worldview: Clay Shirky gets medieval on The Semantic Web.
"In an echo of Richard Gabriel's Worse is Better argumment, the Semantic Web imagines that completeness and correctness of data exposed on the web are the cardinal virtues, and that any amount of implementation complexity is acceptable in pursuit of those virtues. The problem is that the more semantic consistency required by a standard, the sharper the tradeoff between complexity and scale. It's easy to get broad agreement in a narrow group of users, or vice-versa, but not both."
The guy who posted this to Metafilter, however, sums it up better:
"The most damning part of the essay is the part about languages and categories being deeply intertwined with worldview and with culture — if there's no good definition for the word 'bachelor', how can there be an encoding of 'friend', 'lover' ... or anything else that isn't zipcode?"
Computers and information architecture is very rigid, and The Semantic Web strikes me an attempt to cram every bit of...life into some kind of framework. But, sadly, life is more complicated than that. This is the same way I feel about artificial intelligence and "self aware" machines. It's not going to happen. I don't care how fast your machine is — life is too complicated.
Without getting too religious on you, life is more than a calculation. Life is more than A plus B equals C. There's an angle to life that we'll never be able to explain, much less code.
Disney Does Digital, Ditches Drawings
Disney Does Digital, Ditches Drawings - by simoniker (39% noise) View Skip |
Disney Digital? Dangerous. - by Dominic_Mazzoni (Score: 5, Funny) Thread |
PENTAGON CONFUSED BY MUNITION THAT MAKES 2" HOLE IN M1A1 ABRAMS TANK IN IRAQ
Shortly before dawn on Aug. 28, an M1A1 Abrams tank on routine patrol in Baghdad "was hit by something" that crippled the 69-ton behemoth. Army officials still are puzzling over what that "something" was.
As it passed through the interior, it hit enough critical components to knock the tank out of action. That made the tank one of only two Abrams disabled by enemy fire during the Iraq war and one of only a handful of "mobility kills" since they first rumbled onto the scene 20 years ago. The other Abrams knocked out this year in Iraq was hit by an RPG-7, a rocket-propelled grenade.
Experts believe whatever it is that knocked out the tank in August was not an RPG-7 but most likely something new - and that worries tank drivers. Mystery and anxiety. Terry Hughes is a technical representative from Rock Island Arsenal, Ill., who examined the tank in Baghdad and wrote the report.
In the sort of excited language seldom included in official Army documents, he said, "The unit is very anxious to have this 'SOMETHING' identified. It seems clear that a penetrator of a yellow molten metal is what caused the damage, but what weapon fires such a round and precisely what sort of round is it? The bad guys are using something unknown and the guys facing it want very much to know what it is and how they can defend themselves."
HERE'S WHAT THE ARMY SAID:
[ http://www.rense.com/ ]
[ http://secure.sovietski.com ]
(CONTRIBUTOR'S NOTE: Here's what you can buy on the internet! Take a look at the VERY last Warning! Go to the Web Site above and you will see a munition that is about 1.5 inches across and 18 inches long. Somebody is shooting our own crap at us! And they bought it from the Pentagon! Please vote for me! I Swear to GOD, I'm a "c" student, never graduated from Yale and I'm 62.6 times smarter than the Boy King on a "good" day, I used to drink like an absolute fish (up to 17 Jack n Cokes in Fernandina Beach), I never found jesus several years ago because I never really lost in the first place but the ONLY disqualifier for replacing the Boy King, (I never got arrested for a DUI-Controlled Substance!) Crap, if I had ONLY been more irresponsible the Pentagon could have chosen me!)
(ACTUAL INTERNET AD COMPLETE W PHOTO:)
Tank buster missile #200991
$75.00
Special offers:
Tell a friend!
He certainly doesn't have one of these! Armor-piercing missiles were built during the Cold War for the M1-A1 Abrams tank (America's primary battle tank). Dubbed "tank busters," they were designed to take out heavily armored Warsaw Pact tanks on the European battlefield. Tens of thousands of these missiles were destroyed under the Department of Defense's "crush rule." By our wits, some luck and a connection in the Pentagon, we rescued a few practice rounds. Made in the USA of inert materials. Each stands 18" tall and weighs a whopping 8 lbs.! Some engraved with the D.O.D.'s item number (GI M-735). Displayed on your desk or mantel, they'll serve as a reminder of our Cold War past and a talisman for future peace. These make awesome bookends, too!
This item cannot be shipped across international borders.
AL GORETEX